01 Situation
What intervention is appropriate?
Situation decides the commercial starting point. It is the only question that has to be answered first.
How we help
ConfusionDirection
You may be planning something new. You may already be implementing it. The platform may be live but underperforming. You may be considering a different partner. Start with your situation and we will help you find the right route.
The platform does not define the engagement by itself. The right intervention depends on what is actually happening.
Three questions that are not the same question
Situation decides the commercial starting point. Capability identifies what may be required. Context changes how the answer should be designed.
01 Situation
Situation decides the commercial starting point. It is the only question that has to be answered first.
02 Capability
Capability identifies what may be required. It is selected after the commercial situation is understood.
03 Operating context
Context changes how the answer should be designed. It rarely changes the commercial route on its own.
Find your starting point
This is guidance rather than qualification. It points at a sensible place to start, and a person still reviews anything that follows.
The systems question tells us what is involved today. It is context, not a recommendation to buy anything.
Your possible starting point
Answer the first question and a possible commercial starting point appears here, along with any capability that may support it. The second and third questions add context.
Commercial routes
These are not a rigid sequence. Organisations enter wherever the pressure is and move between routes as the situation changes.
Possible starting point
“We are not sure what the real problem is.”
The organisation knows there is a problem, risk or decision, but the cause or the correct route is not yet established.
Explore AssessmentPossible starting point
“We are planning major change.”
The future operating model still needs defining before any platform is configured.
Explore TransformPossible starting point
“We know what we need and are ready to implement.”
The target operating model and platform are sufficiently understood and conventional governed implementation is appropriate.
Explore Standard ImplementationPossible starting point
“Our project is in trouble.”
An active implementation has lost control, confidence or credible delivery status.
Explore RecoverPossible starting point
“Our live platform should work better.”
A live platform works, but it should work materially better.
Explore OptimisePossible starting point
“We need dependable operational support.”
Agreed live capability needs dependable operational support and clear ownership.
Explore SupportPossible starting point
“We are considering changing Microsoft partner.”
The platform may remain, but partner responsibility needs to move in a controlled way.
Explore Partner TransitionDelivery method, not a commercial route
Implementation requirementDelivery qualificationStandard Implementation or RAPID
Standard Implementation
Use where the requirement is understood but complexity, dependencies or readiness require conventional governed delivery.
RAPID
Use only where strict fit, scope, readiness, standardisation and decision velocity support accelerated delivery.
Acceleration depends on fit, readiness and decision velocity. A clear requirement is necessary for RAPID, but it is not sufficient on its own, and a defined requirement does not automatically qualify.
Explore RAPID qualificationAfter go-live
Capability
Useful when the platform area is already settled. If the operating problem is still unclear, start with the situation instead.
The operational platform the business runs on.
A connected core where the operating model can remain relatively standard.
Deeper enterprise complexity across entities, supply chain, warehouse, manufacturing and governance.
Customer, sales, service and case processes connected to the operational core.
Applications, automation and process extension around the platform.
Capability used inside Assessment, Transform, Implementation, Optimise, Support and Customer Success. Not a commercial route on its own.
Reporting and data foundations for decisions people actually make.
Data quality, automation, AI and governed decision support.
Sits beneath Data & AI. Earlier warning is only useful where somebody still has options.
The disciplines that decide whether a route succeeds.
System boundaries, ownership of data and what happens when a connection fails.
What moves, what does not, and what the business is asked to accept.
Governed delivery, decision control and evidence of progress.
Whether people can actually work the new way once it is live.
Identity, access and assurance across human and non-human identities.
Licence hierarchy, entitlement and a date-stamped decision record.
Do not choose the platform first if the operating problem is still unclear. What process needs to work differently? What complexity exists? What needs to connect? What future operating model must the platform support?
Compare ERP optionsOperating context
Industry gives the operating context. It does not determine the platform on its own.
Purpose-built solutions
Each purpose-built solution keeps its parent industry context. They are qualified within that sector rather than offered as generic answers.
CRMS
Qualified within Public Sector.
CMS
Qualified within Healthcare & Care.
CRMS supports crisis, hardship and community support coordination. It is not an emergency command, emergency planning or business continuity management system.
The technology may be the same. The right intervention can be completely different.
Two organisations may both run Dynamics 365 Finance. One needs Recover. The other needs Optimise. Two organisations may both need Business Central. One needs Transform. The other may qualify for an accelerated implementation.
How we approach the decision
Fit matters more than forcing the sale. More technology is not automatically a better answer.
You ask for a replacement.
We may recommend keeping and optimising the current platform.
You ask for a large transformation.
We may recommend Assessment first.
You ask for a new implementation.
We may recommend Standard Implementation rather than RAPID.
You ask us to take over support.
We may recommend Partner Transition first.
You ask for AI.
We may recommend reporting, workflow or ordinary automation.
You ask for Finance & Supply Chain.
We may recommend Business Central, based on operating complexity rather than size.
Qualification may conclude that the current platform, process or partner should remain unchanged. Not every conversation needs to become an InteliSense project.
Illustrative examples
“We have selected Business Central and have an agreed scope.”
Possible starting point: Standard Implementation
RAPID qualification may then be considered as the delivery method.
Explore“We want RAPID but have several complex integrations and uncertain data.”
Possible starting point: Implementation qualification
RAPID may not fit. A governed implementation may be the responsible answer.
Explore“Our platform works but we want a different Microsoft partner.”
Possible starting point: Partner Transition
Changing partner does not automatically require changing platform.
Explore“We are live and stable but do not know which improvement creates the most value.”
Possible starting point: Customer Success review
No change may be a valid outcome for this period.
Explore“We are three months from go-live and nobody trusts the data.”
Possible starting point: Recover
Establish what is true before another date is published.
Explore“We want earlier warning of where tomorrow's warehouse backlog will form.”
Possible starting point: Optimise or Assessment, depending on current state
Capability: Data & AI, including Predictive Intelligence. The capability does not set the commercial route.
ExploreThese scenarios are fictional and illustrative. They are written to explain how routing works, not to describe named customers.
Evidence
Published customer material, in their words rather than ours.
Our current published customer evidence does not cover every route or capability shown on this page. The Customer Stories hub shows what each item is currently verified to support.
Customer video
We transformed our business practices in just 5 months
Hill & Smith describe their Dynamics 365 implementation with InteliSense in their own words.
What it does not prove: Does not establish Recovery, RAPID, Optimise, Support classification. No measured outcome is published with this evidence.
Customer video
Implementing D365 for the British Society of Lifestyle Medicine
A membership organisation describes implementing Dynamics 365 with InteliSense.
What it does not prove: Does not establish Recovery, RAPID, Optimise, Support classification. No measured outcome is published with this evidence.
Customer video
Hear our customers talk about InteliSense
Several customers describe working with InteliSense, in their own words.
What it does not prove: Does not establish Recovery, RAPID, Optimise, Support classification. No verified industry classification. No measured outcome is published with this evidence.
Not ready to talk?
Pulled from the shared resource library, so nothing here is duplicated or left to go stale.
The signals that separate a delayed programme from one with a structural problem.
CEO · CIO · Programme leader
The complexity, scale and control factors that usually decide which enterprise platform fits.
CFO · CIO
What a responsible takeover looks like, and what has to be understood before it starts.
CIO · COO
A routing principle for deciding which of the three conversations you are actually in.
CEO · CIO
Trust, understand, automate, predict, act and learn. Where your organisation actually is.
CIO · CFO
The difference between a report of what happened and an indication of what may happen next.
COO · CIO
Where to start
Still not sure?
You do not need to choose an InteliSense service before speaking to us. Tell us what is happening, where you are today and what systems are involved. We can work out the route from there.